GitHub vs Atlassian (Bitbucket)
Side-by-side provider-status observations over the last 30 days.
GitHub
World's largest source code hosting platform with version control, CI/CD (Actions), code review, project management, and AI coding assistant (Copilot).
OperationalAtlassian (Bitbucket)
Git-based source code repository hosting service with built-in CI/CD pipelines, code review, and seamless integration with Jira and Trello.
Operational| Metric | GitHub | Atlassian (Bitbucket) |
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational | Operational |
| Fully operational observations (30d) | 90.97% | 99.58% |
| Days with Issues | 14 | 1 |
| Feed Type | Statuspage | Statuspage |
| Status Page | View → | View → |
GitHub vs Atlassian (Bitbucket): Reliability Comparison
This page compares the available provider-status history for GitHub and Atlassian (Bitbucket). Reliability is one input alongside product fit, support, security, and contract terms.
Over the last 30 days, 90.97% of known GitHub status observations and 99.58% of known Atlassian (Bitbucket) status observations were fully operational. Their aggregate status pages reported issues on 14 and 1 day, respectively.
This is a normalized provider-status signal, not contractual, probe-based, component-weighted, or user-journey uptime. Collection timing and normalization rules are not published.
Choose alerts for either service by email, Slack, Teams, Google Chat, Discord, or webhook.