SLA Compliance Tracking
Vendor uptime versus published SLA targets: who is meeting their commitments and who is breaching.
866
Meeting SLA
964
Breaching SLA
1,830
SLA-tracked vendors
47%
Compliance rate
| Service | Status | SLA Target | Actual (30d) | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 0.56% | -99.34 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 1.25% | -98.65 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 1.25% | -98.65 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 2.08% | -97.82 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 2.22% | -97.68 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 3.06% | -96.84 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 3.33% | -96.57 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 4.17% | -95.73 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 6.39% | -93.51 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 7.64% | -92.26 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 10.00% | -89.90 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 10.42% | -89.48 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 10.97% | -88.93 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.99% | 14.58% | -85.41 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 15.69% | -84.21 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 17.92% | -81.98 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 19.03% | -80.87 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 19.31% | -80.59 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 21.11% | -78.79 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 21.11% | -78.79 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 22.50% | -77.40 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 23.61% | -76.29 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 24.17% | -75.73 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 25.83% | -74.07 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 26.11% | -73.79 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 26.94% | -72.96 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 28.19% | -71.71 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 28.19% | -71.71 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 28.75% | -71.15 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 29.03% | -70.87 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 29.72% | -70.18 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 32.64% | -67.26 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 33.06% | -66.84 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 33.47% | -66.43 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 33.75% | -66.15 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 33.89% | -66.01 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 34.17% | -65.73 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 36.11% | -63.79 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 36.81% | -63.09 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 40.56% | -59.34 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 41.94% | -57.96 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 42.22% | -57.68 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 43.06% | -56.84 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 43.19% | -56.71 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 43.61% | -56.29 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 45.42% | -54.48 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 45.83% | -54.07 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 46.67% | -53.23 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 46.67% | -53.23 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 47.36% | -52.54 |
How we score SLA compliance
Each vendor is compared against its publicly stated SLA target. "Meeting" means the actual 30-day uptime is at or above the target; "Breaching" means below. Delta is the gap (positive = exceeding by that much; negative = breaching by that much). Breach hours convert the percentage gap into the actual hours of unmet SLA over the period.
See also: uptime rankings for raw 30/90-day reliability and transparency grades for how quickly each vendor acknowledges incidents.