ngrok vs Trigger.dev
Side-by-side reliability comparison based on real-time monitoring data over the last 64 days.
ngrok
Secure tunneling and API gateway platform for exposing local development services to the internet.
OperationalTrigger.dev
Open-source background job framework for building and running long-running tasks and workflows in serverless environments.
Operational| Metric | ngrok | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational | Operational |
| Uptime (64-day) | 95.31% | 96.67% |
| Days with Issues | 3 | 0 |
| Feed Type | Statuspage | Community |
| Status Page | View → | View → |
ngrok vs Trigger.dev: Reliability Comparison
Choosing between ngrok and Trigger.dev? Reliability matters. ServiceAlert.ai tracks both services in real time, monitoring their status pages for outages, degraded performance, and maintenance windows.
Over the last 64 days, ngrok has maintained 95.31% uptime with 3 days of issues, while Trigger.dev has achieved 96.67% uptime with 0 days of issues.
Want instant alerts when either service goes down? Sign up for ServiceAlert.ai to monitor both services and get notified via email, Slack, Teams, Google Chat, Discord, or Webhooks.