Groq vs Hugging Face
Side-by-side reliability comparison based on real-time monitoring data over the last 19 days.
Groq
AI inference platform providing ultra-fast large language model inference with custom LPU hardware for real-time AI applications.
OperationalHugging Face
AI community platform for hosting, sharing, and deploying machine learning models, datasets, and applications with collaborative tools for ML practitioners.
Operational| Metric | Groq | Hugging Face |
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Operational | Operational |
| Uptime (19-day) | 94.44% | 89.47% |
| Days with Issues | 1 | 2 |
| Feed Type | Statuspage | Healthcheck |
| Status Page | View → | View → |
Groq vs Hugging Face: Reliability Comparison
Choosing between Groq and Hugging Face? Reliability matters. ServiceAlert.ai tracks both services in real time, monitoring their status pages for outages, degraded performance, and maintenance windows.
Over the last 19 days, Groq has maintained 94.44% uptime with 1 day of issues, while Hugging Face has achieved 89.47% uptime with 2 days of issues.
Want instant alerts when either service goes down? Sign up for ServiceAlert.ai to monitor both services and get notified via email, Slack, Teams, Google Chat, or Discord.