SLA Compliance Tracking
Vendor uptime versus published SLA targets: who is meeting their commitments and who is breaching.
884
Meeting SLA
940
Breaching SLA
1,824
SLA-tracked vendors
48%
Compliance rate
| Service | Status | SLA Target | Actual (30d) | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 82.64% | -17.26 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 82.78% | -17.12 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 82.78% | -17.12 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 82.92% | -16.98 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 83.19% | -16.71 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 83.19% | -16.71 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 83.33% | -16.57 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 83.47% | -16.43 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 83.61% | -16.29 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 83.75% | -16.15 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 83.89% | -16.01 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 83.89% | -16.01 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.03% | -15.87 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.17% | -15.73 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.31% | -15.59 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.31% | -15.59 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.31% | -15.59 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.58% | -15.32 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.58% | -15.32 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.72% | -15.18 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.72% | -15.18 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 84.86% | -15.04 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 85.00% | -14.90 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 85.00% | -14.90 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 85.14% | -14.76 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 85.14% | -14.76 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 85.28% | -14.62 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 85.69% | -14.21 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 85.69% | -14.21 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 85.97% | -13.93 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.11% | -13.79 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.11% | -13.79 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.25% | -13.65 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.25% | -13.65 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.25% | -13.65 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.39% | -13.51 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.53% | -13.37 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.67% | -13.23 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.81% | -13.09 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.94% | -12.96 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 86.94% | -12.96 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 87.08% | -12.82 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 87.08% | -12.82 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 87.22% | -12.68 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 87.22% | -12.68 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 87.22% | -12.68 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 87.64% | -12.26 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 87.64% | -12.26 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 87.64% | -12.26 |
|
|
Breaching SLA | 99.9% | 88.06% | -11.84 |
How we score SLA compliance
Each vendor is compared against its publicly stated SLA target. "Meeting" means the actual 30-day uptime is at or above the target; "Breaching" means below. Delta is the gap (positive = exceeding by that much; negative = breaching by that much). Breach hours convert the percentage gap into the actual hours of unmet SLA over the period.
See also: uptime rankings for raw 30/90-day reliability and transparency grades for how quickly each vendor acknowledges incidents.